Contents

A Note From the Global Entrepreneurship Network

Jonathan Ortmans

Founder and President Global Entrepreneurship Network (GEN)

The next chapter of global innovation will not be written by the boldest forecast. It will be written by the boldest decisions.

As we publish this year's Global Startup Ecosystem Report, the moment feels qualitatively different from any other in recent memory. Past editions have documented turbulence — funding swings, exit droughts, geopolitical shocks — and the resilience of the entrepreneurs who face it. The story of 2026 is not turbulence. It is transformation. A structural reordering of where, how, and by whom innovation is built is now visible in the data, and its implications will shape the decade ahead.

A Structural Shift, Not a Passing Wave

The debate is no longer whether AI matters, but how fast it is reordering everything around it. AI is not a vertical — it is the substrate on which every vertical is being rebuilt. It is compressing time to market, spawning entirely new categories of startup, and concentrating value and talent in the ecosystems bold enough to organize around it. We have grown accustomed to technological revolutions that take far longer to deliver than their advocates promise. With AI, we may be witnessing the first technological revolution in living memory where the long term is ahead of schedule.

Re-Concentration and the New Geography of Power

For much of the past decade, this report has chronicled the welcome dispersion of opportunity beyond the traditional hubs. That trend has not died — but it has been complicated. Capital and scale are consolidating once more, particularly in the United States, and the gap between leading and emerging ecosystems is widening.
The picture in Asia has shifted markedly. Nearly every Chinese ecosystem in the Top 40 has slipped — Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Hangzhou and Guangzhou all losing ground, with only Wuxi defying the trend. The lesson here is not that geography is destiny. It is that strategy, focus, and execution still decide who rises and who recedes.

Geopolitics as an Ecosystem Force

Conflict and geopolitical tension, often dismissed here at GEN as background noise to entrepreneurial activity, are now more actively rewiring where capital flows and where talent settles. Defense, Cybersecurity and Energy Security have moved from the margins to the mainstream of venture investment. Governments are stepping onto the field as investors, customers, and regulators — particularly in AI, Semiconductors, Defense and Cleantech. The most successful ecosystems will be those that engage the public sector as a genuine partner rather than a distant authority.

Fewer, Bigger Bets — and the Collaboration Imperative

Investment is recovering, but it is not the recovery many anticipated. Deal sizes are larger, selectivity is sharper, and regional imbalance persists in both funding and exits. In this new reality, no single actor — founder, investor, corporate, or state — can scale impact alone. Deep collaboration between startups, corporates, and governments is the critical infrastructure on which the next decade of innovation is being built.

A Compass, Not a Verdict

To the policymakers, investors, and ecosystem builders reading this report, the data in these pages is a compass, not a verdict. It will tell you where ecosystems stand today; it cannot tell you which will lead tomorrow. That answer lies in the choices made now — in whether governments treat entrepreneurs as partners, in whether corporates open their doors to startups, in whether ecosystems double down on inclusion when the temptation is to retreat. The next chapter of global innovation will not be written by the boldest forecast. It will be written by the boldest decisions.

This site uses cookies from Google to deliver its services and to analyze traffic. Your IP address and user-agent are shared with Google along with performance and security metrics to ensure quality of service, generate usage statistics, and to detect and address abuse.